ACLU Challenges Trump’s Birthright Citizenship Order in Court After Supreme Court Ruling

Sarah Johnson
June 28, 2025
Brief
ACLU sues Trump over executive order redefining birthright citizenship, as Supreme Court limits nationwide injunctions, sparking heated constitutional debate.
In a bold move that’s stirring the pot, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and a coalition of legal groups filed a class-action lawsuit in New Hampshire federal court on Friday, challenging President Donald Trump’s January executive order redefining birthright citizenship. This legal jab comes just hours after the Supreme Court handed Trump a win, ruling 6-3 that lower courts can only issue nationwide injunctions in rare cases, potentially paving the way for the order to take effect in parts of the country.
The lawsuit, representing U.S.-born children and their parents, argues that Trump’s order violates the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to anyone born on U.S. soil. The policy denies citizenship to kids whose mothers are undocumented or temporarily in the U.S., and whose fathers aren’t citizens or legal permanent residents. The ACLU calls this a direct attack on America’s core promise of equality, warning it could create a ‘multigenerational subclass’ of stateless children.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, clarified that the Supreme Court’s ruling didn’t touch the legality of Trump’s order but focused on limiting the scope of universal injunctions. Meanwhile, Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s dissent urged swift class-action suits to counter the policy’s ‘blatantly unlawful’ impact. The ACLU, backed by groups like the Legal Defense Fund and Asian Law Caucus, is stepping up, citing cases like a Honduran mother in New Hampshire fearing her U.S.-born child will be denied citizenship.
This isn’t the first rodeo for the ACLU, which filed a similar suit in January 2025, now pending in the 1st Circuit. The new lawsuit leans on the 1898 Wong Kim Ark decision, which cemented birthright citizenship for children of noncitizens. As the legal battle heats up, the administration defends the order as a step to ‘secure our borders,’ while critics argue it’s a constitutional overreach that betrays American values.
Topics
Editor's Comments
Trump’s trying to rewrite the Constitution like it’s a golf scorecard, but the 14th Amendment isn’t a sand trap you can just kick out of. The ACLU’s swinging back hard, and this New Hampshire showdown feels like a legal cage match. Bet the Founding Fathers didn’t picture citizenship being gatekept like a VIP club list!
Like this article? Share it with your friends!
If you find this article interesting, feel free to share it with your friends!
Thank you for your support! Sharing is the greatest encouragement for us.