HomeSportsCalifornia Faces Title IX Violation Over Trans Athlete Controversy in Girls’ Sports
California Faces Title IX Violation Over Trans Athlete Controversy in Girls’ Sports

California Faces Title IX Violation Over Trans Athlete Controversy in Girls’ Sports

Sarah Johnson

Sarah Johnson

June 25, 2025

3 min read

Brief

California violates Title IX over transgender athlete’s participation in girls’ sports, facing federal funding cuts and a 10-day compliance deadline.

The U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) has declared the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) and California Department of Education (CDE) in violation of Title IX, a landmark ruling announced on Wednesday. This decision follows a firestorm of controversy sparked by transgender athlete AB Hernandez’s medal wins in girls’ track and field at the California state championships, igniting debates over fairness in women’s sports.

The ruling aligns with President Donald Trump’s recent executive order, dubbed "No Men in Women’s Sports," which bans transgender athletes from competing in female categories. Education Secretary Linda McMahon didn’t mince words, stating, "California has failed to adhere to its obligations under federal law." She criticized the state for allowing "men to steal female athletes’ well-deserved accolades" and subjecting girls to "unfair and unsafe competitions."

California now faces a tight 10-day deadline to accept a resolution agreement, which includes issuing personalized apologies to female athletes affected by what the OCR calls sex discrimination. The state must also enforce biology-based definitions of male and female in sports and rescind any conflicting guidance. Failure to comply could jeopardize federal funding for California’s K-12 schools.

Governor Gavin Newsom, who previously called transgender participation in girls’ sports "deeply unfair," pushed back, with his spokesperson dismissing the ruling as a "WrestleMania-style" stunt by McMahon. Newsom’s earlier comments to conservative commentator Charlie Kirk acknowledged the fairness issue but emphasized compassion for transgender athletes, citing their higher risks of mental health challenges.

The decision has drawn cheers from advocates like Riley Gaines, who called it a "long-overdue victory for women and girls." Meanwhile, the debate underscores deeper tensions between federal mandates and state policies, with California’s progressive stance clashing against a reinvigorated push for Title IX enforcement.

Editor's Comments

Looks like California’s running a relay race with federal law and tripping at every hurdle. Newsom calls it ‘unfair’ but then plays the compassion card—talk about a political pole vault! Meanwhile, the real losers are the girls who trained for gold, only to get sidelined by bureaucracy. Why not just let athletes compete where biology, not politics, sets the pace?

Like this article? Share it with your friends!

If you find this article interesting, feel free to share it with your friends!

Thank you for your support! Sharing is the greatest encouragement for us.

Related Stories