DOJ Strike Force Probes Obama-Era Trump-Russia Collusion Evidence

In a stunning turn of events, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has launched a specialized strike force to dig into declassified evidence from the Obama era, spotlighting potential misconduct in the origins of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative. This comes on the heels of revelations by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, whose declassified documents suggest a troubling manipulation of intelligence by top officials to paint a false picture of collusion during the 2016 presidential election.

The DOJ, in a statement Wednesday evening, emphasized their grave concern over the alleged weaponization of the intelligence community. They’re pulling no punches, with a source indicating that every lead—however explosive—will be pursued. Attorney General Pam Bondi echoed this resolve, promising a thorough investigation to uncover the truth and deliver justice for the American people.

These developments aren’t happening in a vacuum. Recent declassifications point to a orchestrated effort by Obama administration figures to craft a narrative of Russian interference favoring Donald Trump, despite lacking solid evidence. Names like John Brennan, James Comey, Susan Rice, and even former President Obama himself surface in these documents, alongside admissions from key players that no empirical evidence of collusion ever existed. Yet, the narrative was pushed relentlessly, often leaning on the now-discredited Steele Dossier, funded by Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

Adding fuel to the fire, criminal referrals and investigations targeting Brennan and Comey are underway, with the FBI hinting at a possible conspiracy angle. Meanwhile, newly released transcripts from 2017-2018 House Intelligence Committee interviews reveal Obama-era officials repeatedly admitting they had no concrete proof of Trump-Russia coordination, raising questions about why the probe dragged on for years.

This strike force, comprising seasoned investigators and prosecutors, isn’t just about revisiting old wounds—it’s about accountability. As the layers of this saga peel back, the American public deserves to know if political agendas hijacked national security for partisan gain. The truth, as murky as it may be, is finally getting its day in court.