House Judiciary Prepares Hearings on 'Activist Judges' Blocking Trump Policies

Breaking News: The House Judiciary Committee is gearing up to hold hearings next week on the contentious issue of "activist judges," according to three insiders familiar with the discussions. The hearings come in response to the Trump administration's ongoing battles with more than a dozen injunctions issued by federal district court judges across the U.S., which have put the brakes on a variety of his policy initiatives.

House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio, confirmed the upcoming hearings during a Fox News segment on "America's Newsroom." This announcement followed shortly after the news was initially reported by Fox News Digital. Jordan also hinted at a House vote on a proposed bill by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., aimed at preventing district judges from issuing nationwide injunctions.

The bill, which appears to have the backing of some key conservative lawmakers, could be a major legislative step in addressing what supporters view as judicial overreach. According to Jordan, the vote could happen as early as next week, though insiders suggest it might take slightly longer to solidify.

Meanwhile, Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, has introduced a resolution calling for the impeachment of U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg, a key figure in blocking Trump's use of the Alien Enemies Act. Boasberg recently issued a temporary injunction halting the deportation of suspected gang members to El Salvador, sparking a legal standoff with the White House. Trump supporters are rallying behind Gill's resolution, though House GOP leadership appears hesitant to jump on the impeachment bandwagon, given the uphill battle such a move would face in the Senate.

Conservatives backing Issa's legislation see it as a more pragmatic solution, and Trump himself has reportedly expressed interest in the bill, telling aides on Capitol Hill, "The president wants this." Jordan also praised the bill in his Monday television interview, although his office declined to provide immediate comment on the matter.

In the backdrop of these debates is the broader question of how far conservatives are willing to go to curtail what they perceive as judicial activism. Some GOP lawmakers have filed impeachment resolutions, but House leaders are treading carefully, wary of the political firestorm such measures could ignite.

While the hearings and potential legislation signal a concerted effort by Republicans to combat perceived judicial overreach, the path forward is anything but clear. The theater of politics is alive and well on Capitol Hill, and all eyes will be on the Judiciary Committee as it takes its next steps.