Simon Cowell Sounds the Alarm: AI Shouldn't Steal Human Talent!

Sarah Johnson
March 1, 2025
Simon Cowell is stepping into the AI debate, advocating for artists' rights amidst concerns over artificial intelligence potentially exploiting human creativity. The "America’s Got Talent" judge recently voiced his concerns in The Daily Mail, targeting proposed changes to UK law that could allow companies to freely use online material for AI training unless creators explicitly opt out.
Cowell warns that these changes could jeopardize the livelihoods of artists, potentially "wiping them out." He passionately stated, "The thought that anyone would believe they have the right to blindly give this country’s creative ideas away – for nothing – is just wrong. I passionately care about people’s personal creativity – and AI shouldn’t be able to steal the talent of those humans who created the magic in the first place." He's got a point, right? It's like saying anyone can just sample your music without asking. Not cool.
Back in 2023, Cowell made it clear to Fox News Digital that he's "not a fan" of AI, emphasizing the lasting impact and authenticity of artists like Queen, David Bowie, and Elton John. "Their songs, I think, are as good today as they were then. So, anything which is faking it is, for me, a bit of a problem."
Elton John also weighed in, contributing his thoughts to The Daily Mail, emphasizing the potential devastation to the creative community, especially emerging artists. He argues that the proposal would allow the unauthorized and uncompensated use of music and art to benefit powerful foreign tech companies, calling it "wrong and unnecessary."
John acknowledges the incredible opportunities presented by generative AI but insists on protections for creators' rights, ensuring new artists have brighter opportunities. He fears the proposed copyright exception would destroy the UK's hard-won leadership in the creative sector, giving it all away "for nothing."
Adding to the chorus of dissent, over 1,000 musicians recently released a silent album, "Is this What We Want?", protesting the proposed changes. The album features contributions from British artists like Kate Bush, Annie Lennox, Cat Stevens, and Damon Albarn, and consists of recordings of empty studios and performance spaces, symbolizing the potential consequences of the government's proposals.
Composer and AI developer Ed Newton-Rex explained that the album includes both renowned artists and lesser-known musicians, highlighting the widespread impact of the issue. "It’s a mix of artists that everyone’s heard of and, you know, and many musicians who are not household names," he said. "And I think that’s really important because this issue is going to affect all of us." It's kind of a dramatic statement, but I get it. Silence can be pretty powerful.
Editor's Comments
The core of the issue is about protecting the rights and livelihoods of artists in the age of rapidly advancing AI. It's crucial to strike a balance that allows for technological innovation while ensuring creators are fairly compensated and their work isn't exploited.
Like this article? Share it with your friends!
If you find this article interesting, feel free to share it with your friends!
Thank you for your support! Sharing is the greatest encouragement for us.