South Korean President Removed from Office Four Months After Declaring Martial Law

Sarah Johnson
April 4, 2025
Brief
South Korea’s Constitutional Court has removed President Yoon Suk Yeol after his martial law declaration, triggering political upheaval and a heated race for the presidency.
South Korea’s Constitutional Court has officially removed President Yoon Suk Yeol from office, marking the culmination of a political saga that began four months ago when he declared martial law. The dramatic decision has left the nation reeling, as it now scrambles to elect a new leader within two months.
The court's ruling comes after the opposition-controlled National Assembly voted to impeach Yoon back in December. The president's controversial martial law declaration, which lasted a mere six hours before being overturned by the legislature, triggered a political firestorm that engulfed the country. Millions took to the streets, either in support of or against the embattled president, creating a chaotic and deeply divided national landscape.
Surveys suggest that Lee Jae-myung, leader of the liberal opposition Democratic Party, is the early frontrunner to replace Yoon. However, the race to South Korea's highest office is expected to be fiercely contested.
Yoon’s martial law decree on December 3 sent shockwaves through the nation. The president deployed hundreds of soldiers and police officers to the National Assembly, ostensibly to maintain order. However, senior officials later testified that Yoon had ordered the forces to physically remove lawmakers, aiming to block a vote on his decree. Unsurprisingly, this move was met with outrage and accusations of constitutional violations.
The National Assembly wasted no time, voting on December 14 to impeach Yoon. The charges against him included suppressing assembly activities, attempting to detain politicians, and undermining national peace. The court, in a nationally televised verdict, upheld the impeachment, with acting Chief Justice Moon Hyung-bae emphasizing the gravity of Yoon’s actions.
Moon stated, "Given the grave negative impact on constitutional order and the significant ripple effects of the defendant's violations, we find that the benefits of upholding the constitution by removing the defendant from office far outweigh the national losses from the removal of a president."
Yoon has yet to publicly respond to the court's decision, but his ruling People Power Party has indicated it will respect the verdict. In the meantime, South Korea faces the challenge of restoring political stability and choosing a leader who can heal the divisions exacerbated by this tumultuous saga.
Topics
Editor's Comments
Well, if this isn't a Netflix-worthy political drama, I don't know what is. Six hours of martial law that led to millions on the streets and a president's impeachment? It's like he tried to speedrun a government crisis. Maybe next time, someone should remind leaders that constitutional violations tend to have a pretty hefty price tag.
Like this article? Share it with your friends!
If you find this article interesting, feel free to share it with your friends!
Thank you for your support! Sharing is the greatest encouragement for us.