Supreme Court’s Historic Rulings Curb Judges, Boost Parental Rights, and Protect Kids Online

The Supreme Court wrapped up its term with a flurry of historic rulings, shaking up judicial power and igniting debates across the cultural and political spectrum. In a bold move, the justices, by a 6-3 vote, slammed the brakes on nationwide injunctions—those sweeping orders from lower court judges that have long frustrated administrations, particularly President Trump’s. This decision, stemming from Trump’s contentious birthright citizenship plan, doesn’t touch the plan’s merits but reins in judges’ ability to issue blanket rulings that halt policies nationwide. Expect plaintiffs to pivot to class action lawsuits to keep their legal fights alive.

In a win for parental rights, the Court ruled 6-3 in Mahmoud v. Taylor, allowing parents to opt their kids out of Maryland school lessons on homosexuality and transgenderism if they clash with religious beliefs. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, emphasized that forcing kids into such lessons threatens parents’ religious freedom. Meanwhile, Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s fiery dissent warned this could unravel public education, letting students cherry-pick lessons at will.

Texas scored a victory as the Court upheld its law requiring age verification for pornographic websites, a move to shield kids from explicit content. Texas AG Ken Paxton called it a triumph for child safety, though the porn industry argued it curtails free speech. Finally, the Court punted on Louisiana’s congressional map dispute, delaying changes to its voting districts until at least 2028.

As the justices head for summer recess, these decisions mark a pivotal moment, reshaping judicial reach and cultural battles. More rulings may trickle out before the next term kicks off in October.