Trump Blasts Court’s Tariff Ruling as Political, Calls for Swift Supreme Court Action

Sarah Johnson
May 30, 2025
Brief
Trump slams court’s tariff ruling as political, urges Supreme Court to act fast, while targeting Federalist Society’s Leonard Leo in fiery social media post.
President Donald Trump unleashed a fiery social media tirade Thursday night, blasting a federal court’s ruling against his proposed tariffs as a politically motivated attack. The U.S. Court of International Trade had declared Trump’s tariff plans, rooted in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, an overreach of authority. Yet, in a twist, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit allowed the tariffs to stay in effect temporarily, creating a legal tug-of-war that’s anything but dull.
Trump took to Truth Social, questioning the judges’ motives with characteristic flair: “Is it purely a hatred of ‘TRUMP?’ What other reason could it be?” He argued these tariffs are “desperately needed” to shield America’s economic interests, framing the court’s decision as a direct threat to national prosperity. His passion for economic protectionism shone through, painting a vision of a “rich, prosperous, and successful” America if his policies prevail.
In a surprising pivot, Trump also targeted Leonard Leo, a key figure in the Federalist Society, accusing him of steering judicial nominations astray during Trump’s early Washington days. “A real sleazebag,” Trump called him, expressing regret over some judicial picks while praising others. Leo fired back Friday morning, defending his role in reshaping the federal judiciary and calling Trump’s influence transformative, despite the jab.
Trump’s closing plea was a call to arms for the Supreme Court to “reverse this horrible, Country-threatening decision” swiftly. He insists the president must have the power to protect the nation from economic harm, leaving no doubt about his resolve to fight this battle to the end.
Topics
Editor's Comments
Trump’s tariff tantrum is like watching a chef demand his recipe stay untouched, only to find the kitchen staff swapped sugar for salt. The courts are playing referee, but is the Supreme Court ready to taste this dish? And Leonard Leo? He’s like the sous-chef caught in the crossfire, still insisting the meal’s a masterpiece.
Like this article? Share it with your friends!
If you find this article interesting, feel free to share it with your friends!
Thank you for your support! Sharing is the greatest encouragement for us.