Mahmood Mamdani’s Anti-Israel Posts Spark Outrage Amid Son’s NYC Mayoral Bid

In a stunning revelation, unearthed social media posts from Mahmood Mamdani, a prominent Columbia University professor and father of New York City socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, lay bare a deeply rooted anti-Israel stance. His online rhetoric, peppered with terms like 'settlers' and 'colonial occupation,' paints a picture of unyielding opposition to Israel, often framing Palestinian actions as rightful resistance.

Back in May 2021, during a violent clash between Israel and Hamas, Mamdani posted on X, questioning the language of self-defense claimed by what he calls the 'Occupation,' while advocating for the right to resist. Earlier that month, he heralded what he saw as the beginnings of a Third Intifada, describing it as a broader movement against settler colonialism, far beyond a mere conflict with Hamas.

These statements are not isolated. Mamdani has consistently referred to the Israeli-Palestinian situation as a colonial struggle, not a balanced conflict, and has paid tribute to controversial figures like Ali Mazrui, whose own remarks about Jewish identity have sparked significant backlash. This history of provocative commentary extends to his active participation in pro-Palestine protests at Columbia, including efforts to block Jewish students from accessing certain campus areas during tense demonstrations.

The political implications are heavy, especially with Zohran Mamdani in the mayoral race. Both father and son have faced accusations of antisemitism from Jewish groups—a charge they’ve pushed back against—while critics argue their views threaten core American values of tolerance and equality. Human rights attorney Brooke Goldstein didn’t mince words, condemning the Mamdani family’s ideology as anti-American and divisive, warning of the dangers such perspectives pose in public life.

This controversy isn’t just about personal beliefs; it’s a window into the ideological battles playing out in our universities and political arenas. As the mayoral race heats up, the question remains: can leadership emerge from such polarizing foundations, or will it further fracture an already divided community?