HomePoliticsUniversity Doctor Proudly Explains Loopholes to Evade Anti-DEI Laws: 'That's What We Do'

University Doctor Proudly Explains Loopholes to Evade Anti-DEI Laws: 'That's What We Do'

Sarah Johnson

Sarah Johnson

March 18, 2025

4 min read

Brief

Dr. Haywood Brown of USF explains how he circumvents Florida's anti-DEI laws, sparking controversy, university scrutiny, and renewed debate over diversity policies in education and healthcare.

FIRST ON FOX: A university doctor has revealed his methods for circumventing anti-diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) laws in Florida, sparking controversy and sharp criticism from various groups. During a recent presentation at Virginia Commonwealth University, Dr. Haywood Brown, associate vice president of Academic Affairs at the University of South Florida (USF), detailed how he continues to implement DEI strategies despite legal and political restrictions.

Brown's presentation included remarks on avoiding state and federal discrimination laws alongside the Supreme Court's recent ruling that prohibits race-conscious admissions. "I really want to discuss the threat of the anti-woke movement to medical education and training and health equity," Brown said in a video obtained by Fox News Digital, showcasing his unapologetic stance.

While his official job title was altered—he no longer holds the position of vice president for Institutional Equity—Brown admitted his responsibilities have remained unchanged. "Even though I eliminated my title, I didn't eliminate my job," he stated, explaining how the DEI office at USF was rebranded to focus on "cultural enrichment" instead. "As long as it works? That's what we do," Brown said with a touch of audacity.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis signed legislation in 2023 banning the use of government funds for DEI activities. The law defines DEI as programs or policies that classify individuals based on race, gender, or sexual orientation and promote preferential treatment. Brown, however, expressed pride in his ability to sidestep such directives, stating, "I’ve learned how slippery you need to be when you’re talking to legislators."

Brown's remarks also included a jab at White House official Stephen Miller, a vocal critic of DEI initiatives. "Stephen Miller has already tried to attack the University of South Florida," Brown said. "He's a Dookie [Duke University alum]. We don't claim him." Such provocative comments only fueled the growing backlash.

The University of South Florida has since issued a statement expressing disappointment in Brown’s remarks, noting that he is set to retire on July 1. "The university follows all state and federal guidance, policies, and laws, and any suggestion otherwise by Dr. Brown is untrue. USF is reviewing this matter," a spokesperson said.

Critics of DEI policies were quick to respond. Kristina Rasmussen, executive director of Do No Harm, called Brown's speech "a wake-up call" for legislators and healthcare professionals. "Woke DEI ideology is invasive at our university medical schools," Rasmussen said. "This is just another example of how health systems across the country are intentionally prioritizing a woke agenda over patient care."

Will Hild, executive director of Consumers’ Research, echoed similar sentiments, accusing institutions like USF and VCU of attempting to deceive the public. "Organizations like VCU think they can pull the wool over Americans' eyes by inviting speakers like Dr. Haywood Brown," Hild said. "Someone should tell them they are effectively inviting scrutiny by the Trump Administration."

As the debate continues, it remains unclear whether Brown’s methods will face legal repercussions, though his remarks have undoubtedly reignited the ongoing clash over DEI policies in education and healthcare.

Topics

Dr. Haywood BrownUSFDEI lawsFloridaanti-DEI legislationdiversity policiesmedical educationcontroversyRon DeSantisuniversity healthcarePoliticsEducationHealthcare

Editor's Comments

Dr. Brown's unapologetic swagger is almost impressive, if not eyebrow-raising. Rebranding DEI initiatives as 'cultural enrichment' and 'healthcare access' feels like a masterclass in bureaucratic wordplay. But his candor about 'slippery' tactics might be his undoing—it’s not often you see a public figure openly admit to dodging legal directives. If nothing else, it’s a bold move... maybe too bold.

Like this article? Share it with your friends!

If you find this article interesting, feel free to share it with your friends!

Thank you for your support! Sharing is the greatest encouragement for us.

Related Stories